← Back to the blog
7 min read

The Interview Is Not An Exam

I have interviewed hundreds of people and been interviewed for roles I badly wanted. The candidates who stayed with me were never the most polished ones.

By Dr Samir Bata (Executive Coach)

Most people prepare for interviews the way they prepared for university examinations.

They memorise. They rehearse answers to predicted questions. They arrive with a folder of achievements and wait for the opportunity to recite them.

Then they leave the room having said everything they planned to say, and they do not get the job, and they cannot understand why.

I have sat on the hiring side of that table many times. Let me tell you what I was actually doing while you were answering.

I was not scoring your answer

I was trying to work out one thing: what is this person like on a bad day?

Anyone can describe a success. Success stories are all roughly the same shape, and after four candidates they blur into one another. What separates people is how they speak about difficulty.

The candidate who says "the project failed, and looking back, I moved too fast on the client side" tells me more in one sentence than an hour of polished achievement.

That candidate has judgement. Judgement is the only thing I cannot train.

The structure is fine. It is not the point.

Yes, describe the situation. Yes, say what you did and what resulted. Structure helps me follow you.

But the structure is the frame, not the picture. What makes a story land is the moment inside it where something was genuinely uncertain and you had to choose.

So when you prepare, do not prepare achievements. Prepare decisions.

For each one, know three things: what you knew at the time, what you did not know, and why you chose as you did. That is a story a senior interviewer will remember at the end of a long day.

The question behind the question

When someone asks why you want this role, they are not asking about ambition. They are asking whether you will still be here in three years.

When they ask about a conflict with a colleague, they are not asking whether you are agreeable. They are asking whether you can be honest about your own contribution to a mess.

When they ask what you would do in your first ninety days, they are not looking for a plan. They are checking whether you have the humility to say you would listen first.

Answer the question behind the question, and the conversation changes character entirely.

The one thing I remember about the best candidate I ever hired

She asked me a question I could not answer well.

Not an aggressive question. A precise one, about a contradiction between two things I had said about the business. She had listened closely enough to notice, and she was confident enough to ask.

I hired her because in ninety seconds she had shown me attention, courage and respect at the same time. She stayed nine years.

Bring one such question. Not from a list. From having genuinely thought about the organisation.

A quiet moment

Before your next interview, write down one professional decision you regret.

Then write what you learned from it, in two sentences, without defending yourself.

If you can say that out loud calmly, you are ready. Everything else is preparation of a lesser kind.

Adapted from themes in my book, "Take The Lead."


Keep reading